As Ukraine continues its war effort, questions remain about whether the country can ever reconcile its internal divisions—or whether the policies of Hanul and his ideological allies have set Ukraine on a path of permanent conflict. If nothing else, his assassination is a stark reminder that the very forces he helped empower may eventually consume those who once led them.
Baba Wes “W.C.” Johnson, has worked the streets of New Orleans since the early 1980s, Organizing several organizations to fight police murder and brutality throughout…
“Time for an Awakening” with Bro.Elliott & Bro.Richard, Sunday 1/12/2025 at 7:00 PM (EST) guest was Educator, Journalist, Staff Writer for the Final Call, Nisa I. Muhammad. Our guest, Journalist Nisa…
“Time for an Awakening” with Bro.Elliott & Bro.Richard, Sunday 12/22/2024 at 7:00 PM (EST) guest was Journalist, Educator, Professor and Past Chair, Department of Pan-African Studies University of…
The recent attacks by MSNBC on Tulsi Gabbard, alleging “secret” meetings with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, appear to be part of a coordinated effort to discredit both Gabbard and her nomination to a national security position under Donald Trump’s incoming administration.
“Time for an Awakening” for Sunday 12/15/2024 at 7:00 PM (EST) 6:00 PM (CST) guest will be Activist, Organizer (former Vice- Presidential Green Party candidate), Prof.…
By Scotty Reid – BTR News In a recent segment titled “Eggs, Car Insurance SKYROCKET Inflation Numbers Ahead Of Trump,” Breaking Points contributors Ryan and…
In this episode of BTR News w/ Scotty Reid, we explore how seemingly harmless acts like creating, sharing, and promoting media that vaguely “thanks the…
Baba Wes “W.C.” Johnson, has worked the streets of New Orleans since the early 1980s, Organizing several organizations to fight police murder and brutality throughout…
In this episode of Black Talk Radio News w/ Scotty Reid, we deconstruct the bipartisan implementation of fascist tactics in the United States. From authoritarian…
“Time for an Awakening” With Bro.Elliott & Bro.Richard, Sunday 11/24/2024 at 7:00 PM (EST) 6:00 PM (CST) guest was Activist, Organizer, Vice President of the…
Join us for the debut episode of Deconstructing Proxy Racism, airing tonight at 9 PM EST. In this kickoff session, we’ll explore the foundational concept…
BTR News with Scotty Reid explores Dr. Norman Finkelstein’s statement that “Democrats legitimized genocide” and examines how previous administrations have contributed to the expansion of…
Baba Wes “W.C.” Johnson, has worked the streets of New Orleans since the early 1980s, Organizing several organizations to fight police murder and brutality throughout…
Today, we’re diving into the psychology behind how certain individuals can justify or even support acts of ethnic cleansing, comparable in scale to some of…
In this episode of Black Talk Radio News, we tackle the urgent question of reparations for African American descendants of American slavery, Jim Crow, and…
During the first hour today we will discuss some the social/political news of the day. A few stories on my radar is the false reports being circulated by right wing blogs that Michael Brown’s mother took to facebook to post comments “celebrating” the reported shooting of two cops in Ferguson.
During the second hour we will be joined by Ms. Angela Chan to discuss legalized slavery in the United States and the illegal use of detained immigrant labor by prisons.
Ms. Angela Chan is the policy director and senior staff attorney at the Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus. Ms. Chan recently authored an article dealing with the 13th Amendment titled. “America Never Abolished Slavery” which was published on the Huffington Post.
In the article Ms. Chan comes to conclusion that the 13th Amendment did not technically abolish slavery and that the loop hole that allows for slavery as punishment for crime has been exploited to create a slave labor force in America.
After we speak to Ms. Chan, lets revisit the news reports first surfacing when two non-Ferguson police officers were allegedly shot in front of the Ferguson police department. Since the shooting, the news being reported and statements by St. Louis law enforcement officials have been inconsistent and some deliberately attempting to tie protests against racist police terrorist to the shooting instead of treating it as an individual incident of alleged crime.
3 Replies to “Black Talk Radio News – America in fact did not abolish slavery w/ Immigration Attorney Angela Chan”
Some after thoughts about this show. I was delighted to hear that Ms. Angela
Chan was coming on your show to talk about the 13th Amendment. I was
particularly interested in how she would interpret the law. This is what
she is trained to do.
She did not study law to become an Abolitionist, by default it has landed in
her lap based on her findings in this article she has written.
One must understand that Ms. Chan is a lawyer and her job is to interpret
the rule of law. Of course many would feel in the public arena that she is
more than qualified to dissect the 13th Amendment more so, than someone
who does not have her credentials…..BUT she is NOT qualified and she said herself that she does not want to Co-Op anyone who has been around longer
in the Abolitionist Movement than she has with respect to being an advocate
for becoming an Abolitionist.
It would seem to me that her basic premise is to get the knowledge out to
the masses that the 13th Amendment is very much alive and in full force.
She is not going on the circuit and talk about the agenda that Max stated.
Max. and Yohanan, are qualified individuals who can go out on the circuit and
present this case to public. Max and Yohanan, knows the hard cold facts
about the Prison Industrial/Slave Plantation Complex Corporation. Max
outlined some goals that the Abolitionist Movement is striving for.
With all due respect, Ms. Chan will never “BRING IT” like Max or Yohanan.
These two distinguished gentlemen Max and Yohanan are your ministers
of the movement not Ms. Chan.
Ms. Chan caught me off guard when she agreed that ” just
acknowledging that slavery was never abolished is enough to become
an abolitionist . Ms. Chan was just saying what you wanted to hear, because
she knows dog on well that is simply not true in her line of work.
“A lawyer job is to prove he/ his case, not simply state it.”
I like many other informative listeners prefer a “tick for tack” interview style.
Although the show was informative, I felt that she could have extracted
more from you had she asked some questions, which only lead me to believe that she really was not interested .At times, I felt that she was agreeing with
you without question and I felt that was superficial.
Well said Lena. I kind of got the same vibe regarding her reply to Scotty. My goal was to take her over the edge. You’ve seen the potential now realize the truth. I’m glad she put that article out. I’m glad Huff Post published it. But it still only begins to shed a light on an inconceivable corruption of every ideal this nation is built upon. Those of freedom and democracy.
I’m also very thankful you shared your thoughts here.
Correction, I recall stating “recognize slavery exists and work in any capacity to end it”. That in fact is all an abolitionist is, someone who sees and acknowledges slavery and works to end it.”
It seemed to me her apprehension was about appropriating a movement, like we made up the term and thereby leaders of some sort. Abolitionism was here long before I was and anyone alive today.
It is not my place to say this person ain’t a abolitionist and this person is when the formula is quite simple either you are or you are not. No one has to give her a card saying she is in the club. I think she is a great abolitionists ally.
Some after thoughts about this show. I was delighted to hear that Ms. Angela
Chan was coming on your show to talk about the 13th Amendment. I was
particularly interested in how she would interpret the law. This is what
she is trained to do.
She did not study law to become an Abolitionist, by default it has landed in
her lap based on her findings in this article she has written.
One must understand that Ms. Chan is a lawyer and her job is to interpret
the rule of law. Of course many would feel in the public arena that she is
more than qualified to dissect the 13th Amendment more so, than someone
who does not have her credentials…..BUT she is NOT qualified and she said herself that she does not want to Co-Op anyone who has been around longer
in the Abolitionist Movement than she has with respect to being an advocate
for becoming an Abolitionist.
It would seem to me that her basic premise is to get the knowledge out to
the masses that the 13th Amendment is very much alive and in full force.
She is not going on the circuit and talk about the agenda that Max stated.
Max. and Yohanan, are qualified individuals who can go out on the circuit and
present this case to public. Max and Yohanan, knows the hard cold facts
about the Prison Industrial/Slave Plantation Complex Corporation. Max
outlined some goals that the Abolitionist Movement is striving for.
With all due respect, Ms. Chan will never “BRING IT” like Max or Yohanan.
These two distinguished gentlemen Max and Yohanan are your ministers
of the movement not Ms. Chan.
Ms. Chan caught me off guard when she agreed that ” just
acknowledging that slavery was never abolished is enough to become
an abolitionist . Ms. Chan was just saying what you wanted to hear, because
she knows dog on well that is simply not true in her line of work.
“A lawyer job is to prove he/ his case, not simply state it.”
I like many other informative listeners prefer a “tick for tack” interview style.
Although the show was informative, I felt that she could have extracted
more from you had she asked some questions, which only lead me to believe that she really was not interested .At times, I felt that she was agreeing with
you without question and I felt that was superficial.
“Kudos” to Ms. Chan and keep up the good work.
Well said Lena. I kind of got the same vibe regarding her reply to Scotty. My goal was to take her over the edge. You’ve seen the potential now realize the truth. I’m glad she put that article out. I’m glad Huff Post published it. But it still only begins to shed a light on an inconceivable corruption of every ideal this nation is built upon. Those of freedom and democracy.
I’m also very thankful you shared your thoughts here.
Correction, I recall stating “recognize slavery exists and work in any capacity to end it”. That in fact is all an abolitionist is, someone who sees and acknowledges slavery and works to end it.”
It seemed to me her apprehension was about appropriating a movement, like we made up the term and thereby leaders of some sort. Abolitionism was here long before I was and anyone alive today.
It is not my place to say this person ain’t a abolitionist and this person is when the formula is quite simple either you are or you are not. No one has to give her a card saying she is in the club. I think she is a great abolitionists ally.