Teachers and parents picket outside a Chicago Board of Education meeting
WERE BLACK students the real losers in the recent Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) strike?
What is different for Black Chicago children two weeks after a grueling,
internationally watched, hard-fought strike than two weeks before the
strike? By most accounts, Black children will go back to the same
schools they attended before the strike with few difference-making
improvements...There is an old African proverb: When elephants fight, it
is the grass that gets trampled. When big cities and school boards
fight with teachers' unions, it is the children who get trampled!
Jackson cites a litany of damning statistics detailing the vast
educational and social injustice African Americans face in Chicago as
evidence that the teachers' strike did nothing to advance the struggle
against racism. For example, Jackson points out that only 39 percent of
Black male teens graduate from Chicago Public Schools; 54 percent of
Black men in Chicago are not working; and in Illinois, twice as many
African American men were in prison than in college.
These injustices represent only the very tip of the iceberg when it
comes to racism and inequality in Chicago and the state of Illinois.
But it was precisely these conditions of poverty, racism and
inequality that the Chicago Teachers Union placed at the center of its
strike against Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
Of course, Emanuel and his billionaire cronies worked hard, with the
passage of Senate Bill 7 last year, to further narrow and restrict what
issues Chicago teachers could formally strike over. Thus, it was easy
for the media to portray the teachers were only striking over wages and
job security.
But for anyone paying attention, the CTU strike has done more to
highlight the racial and economic injustice at the heart of education in
urban school districts than any event in at least a generation.
The handmade signs of teachers, parents and students have educated
the nation and the world about the abysmal conditions in Chicago Public
Schools. It is now common knowledge in Chicago and around the country
that 86 percent of CPS students are low-income. It is now common
knowledge that in June, while school is still in session, students
swelter during 90 degree-plus days in classrooms without air
conditioning.
It is now known that CPS students went up to six weeks into the
school year without textbooks--this is one of the issues where the union
won a promise of change in their new contract. The supposed common
sense logic of evaluating teachers based on the performance of their
students on standardized tests--while ignoring larger social factors
like violence and poverty--has been forever punctured.
Because of the strike action taken by the CTU, a long overdue
discussion connecting race, poverty, standardized tests and inequality
in the system of public education in Chicago and beyond has intensified.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THIS WAS not by accident--it was by design.
The new leadership of the CTU, which took office after a sweeping
election win in 2010, is made up of former classroom teacher-activists
who formed the Caucus of Rank and File Educators (CORE) to organize for a
fighting union. And from long before CORE won union office,
its members participated in the struggle against public school closings and the conversion of public schools into privately controlled charter schools.
Because Chicago public school students are more than 90 percent
students of color and almost 90 percent poor, the fight against school
closures inevitably raised issues of racism and class inequality.
Chicago is the most segregated city in the U.S. and its schools are
wracked by inequality. According to government statistics, the child
poverty rate is over 30 percent, yet 87 percent of students in CPS come
from low-income families.
A 2010 study on public education in Chicago identified 46 "truly disadvantaged" schools in Chicago, in which the
students come from families with a median annual income under $10,000,
99 percent are African American, and almost 25 percent have
substantiated claims of abuse or neglect filed with a city agency.
The CTU underlined all this when they declared "education apartheid" as a key issue facing CPS in the union's report titled
"The Schools Chicago's Students Deserve." On the other hand, CPS chief Jean-Claude Brizard rejects the idea that
racial and economic inequality are part of the crisis in CPS schools.
"No one can say that money is the solution,"
Brizard said at a forum at a South Side church last winter.
"These schools have been resourced appropriately. We have not gotten a
return on the investment. Our kids are not getting what they need."
Even within CPS, the minority of white students who still attend
public schools are showered with resources and money compared to the
Black and Brown student majority.
White students are only 8.8 percent of the district, but
they make up 25 percent of students in the system's exclusive selec....
A disproportionate number of these schools are located on the largely
white North side of Chicago--and new enrollment rules at some schools
requiring more spots for neighborhood children will ensure that white
students have even more access.
When it comes to money, the selective enrollment schools get a wildly
disproportionate share of funds from the Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
system. City revenue designated as TIF funds are supposed to be directed
to development projects in poor neighborhoods, but the TIF system has
functioned as what Chicago Reader journalist Ben Joravsky called a
"slush fund" for Mayor Richard Daley and now Emanuel to funnel money to
their wealthy allies and donors.
That's clearly true about TIF money within CPS.
According to a report by a Roosevelt University professor,
though selective enrollment schools have only 1 percent of CPS
students, they received 24 percent of TIF money that went into
construction and repair projects. funding. Schools described as "heavily
white" got 23 percent of TIF money, even though fewer than 9 percent of
CPS students are white.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE SUCCESS of the CTU in making connections to the wider issues of
racism and inequality has to be measured, at least in part, by the wide
support expressed for the strike.
While the local and national media focused on how parents would find
child care during the strike, CPS parents themselves overwhelmingly
supported the teachers' union. This was established early on when a
local news poll found that parents trusted the CTU over the mayor on
education issues by an almost two-to-one margin.
The support actually went up during the strike.
A poll from one news website found that fully 66 percent of parents with kids in CPS supported the
strike, compared to 31 percent who were opposed--an even bigger majority
in favor of teachers than among all city residents. Support was equally
strong in communities of color in general--some 63 percent of African
Americans and 65 percent of Latinos supported the CTU.
Bruce Rauner, the billionaire venture capitalist, charter school
advocate and close adviser to Rahm Emanuel, claimed that the CTU waged a
"mass campaign of misinformation," but the only way to explain the
overwhelming support for the teachers is that parents know far better
than a white billionaire the conditions of their children's schools--and
they saw the CTU as attempting to do something about this.
Again, this didn't happen by accident. The CTU developed
relationships in neighborhoods around the city, for example, by
partnering with community organizations like Kenwood Oakland Community
Organization (KOCO) to protest school closings on the South and West
Side--not in the heat of the strike, but both before and after the CORE
activists won the leadership of the union. This past winter,
CTU members joined with KOCO and other activists for demonstrations at Board of Education meetings where 17 school closures or "turnarounds" were rammed through.
It's also important not to reduce the gains of the strike to merely
how it highlighted inequality in public education, as important as that
is. The CTU's fight for decent pay raises and job security on the one
hand and opposition to merit pay and evaluations linked to standardized
tests on the other are critical in the struggle over the future and
quality of public education, in a city where the vast majority of
students are Black or Latino.
The corporate education "deformers" want to end tenure and job
security to pave the way for cheap, inexperienced teachers who are more
affordable in the new era of austerity budgets and diminished public
services and public welfare. But given the range of social issues
confronting most CPS students, wouldn't they benefit most from
experienced educators?
The CTU's fight for job security in the form of teacher recall is a
way of insuring that the most experienced teachers are kept in schools,
and not sidelined because they cost too much. This is also a way of
fighting the disproportionate layoff of Black teachers, who are
overrepresented in the schools most likely to face closure or
"turnaround"--in which the entire staff is fired.
The union's fight against merit pay goes hand in hand with keeping
good, experienced teachers in the schools that get the fewest resources.
If teacher pay and job security are linked to the performance of their
students on standardized tests,
why would any teacher ever willingly go to the poorest and most res... Merit pay would simply institutionalize the trend of the least
experienced--and therefore least well-compensated--teachers cycling
through the poorest schools.
Likewise, the CTU was absolutely right against linking teacher
evaluations to student performance on standardized tests. It is widely
accepted that
standardized tests do not measure intellect or learning ability;
instead, they are indicators of access to resources and markers of
class status. Under the system of tying evaluation to testing pushed by
Emanuel and the city, teachers who take on the challenge of teaching in
under-resourced schools would be punished for doing so.
Then there's the way that the frenzy for standardized testing has
reshaped the curriculum and the school day around preparing for tests,
rather than promoting creativity and critical thinking in the classroom
for teachers and students. This distortion of classroom priorities is
all the more pronounced in poor and predominantly Black and Latino
schools whose fate--whether they stay open or are shut down--may depend
on the next round of tests.
The media portrayed the CTU's determination to hold the line on such
questions as matter of teachers looking out for their own interests--but
the quality of public schools depends on teachers, parents, students
and others challenging this broader deform agenda.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WHAT ALL the attacks on teachers have in common is a staple idea from
school deformers--the rejection of the idea that poverty and material
deprivation have an overarching impact on student performance. This is
the Dangerous Minds depiction of public schools--the myth that
transcendent (almost always white) teachers who simply love teaching can
overcome the obstacles of poverty and resource-starved schools.
But in real-world cities like Chicago--where poverty, unemployment,
violence foreclosures and evictions are at appallingly high, and
sometimes unprecedented, levels--personal grit and will power fail in
the face of the institutional hostility that actively suppresses Black
academic learning and potential achievement.
The notion that poverty don't matter fits into a larger, neoliberal
political framework which preaches that success or failure is based on
individual responsibility, not access to robust public spending. Poverty
is seen as a natural phenomenon, where some people just "happen" to be
poor and others "happen" to do better--and so, no legislative or
institutional response is needed.
Thus, while hundreds of studies link poverty and under-resourced
schools to poor academic achievement, the evidence is willfully ignored.
And when the lie that poverty doesn't matter is repeated over and over
again without a firm response, the lie takes hold in many people's
minds.
What exactly are these quiet problems?...The range...is vast. Hunger,
dehydration, asthma, obesity, and hearing problems can all insidiously
trip children up in school. Some quiet problems are
psychological--depression, anxiety, the fear of utter destitution...In
one school outside Boston, a teacher told me that two brothers were
coming to school on alternate days because they had only one pair of
shoes between them. Certain quiet problems are especially pervasive and
concerning. One is caretaking responsibility, such as having to take care of a depressed or sick parent or look after younger siblings.
One consequence of the rejection of poverty as a factor in the crisis
of schools and the institutional refusal to undertake anti-poverty
initiatives is a reliance in public schools on suspensions, expulsions
and arrests to maintain discipline and order. This is similar to the
dynamic in poor communities of ramped-up repression by the criminal
justice. Where city governments have slashed public service budgets and
offer no alternatives to record high levels of poverty and unemployment,
heavy policing, stop-and-frisk practices and brutality fill the vacuum.
According to a report by the Civil Rights Project at UCLA,
Illinois leads the country in disciplinary action taken against Black
students. One in every four African American students was suspended at
least once in the 2009-10 school year. By comparison, fewer than 4
percent of white students were suspended.
Chicago contributed a disproportionate share to the state's
suspensions, with more than 30 percent of Black students suffering
disciplinary actions, five times more than white students. The worst
category of all was for Black male students with disabilities--72
percent suffered at least one suspension during the 2009-10 school year.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CTU PRESIDENT Karen Lewis said that during one of her first meetings
with Rahm Emanuel, the mayor claimed that 25 percent of CPS students
would amount to nothing, and that he wouldn't waste resources on them.
Emanuel denies he said this. Readers can decide whether they believe him
or Karen Lewis.
But whether Emanuel said this or not, the actions of his
administration speak loud and clear. Struggling schools in Black
communities are starved of resources, insuring their failure, while the
teachers, parents and students are blamed. Mental health clinics and
libraries are closed down. Unemployment and poverty are on the rise and
not a single anti-poverty program has been suggested, let alone funded
by the city under Emanuel.
Instead, the mayor and his billionaire buddies spent millions to
bring NATO to Chicago--and, or course, to run an endless loop of TV
commercials bizarrely declaring Emanuel as the victor in the teachers'
strike.
But the Chicago Teachers Union is neither the enemy of Black
students, nor just another institution contributing to their oppression.
Rather, the CTU is leading the struggle for education justice in
Chicago and the country.
Whether or not this struggle for education and racial justice
stops the school closures and "turnarounds," the unequal distribution of
resources, the racist disciplinary policy and more will depend on the
CTU's continued commitment to reaching out and partnering with the
communities who bear the brunt of these attacks--and on community
activists linking arms with the teachers to fight for the schools our
children deserve.
We should all stand together with the teachers, parents and kids of
this city in what is shaping up to be the civil rights fight of our
time.